 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LessDragProd(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: 540 power settings |
|
|
Just some general information on three different 540 power settings.
This information was obtained in an unfinished (unpainted and some fairings missing) RV-10 with a 3 blade MT Propeller.
The data was taken at 8,000' density altitude, at full throttle (around 23' MP) and leaned consistently:
2500 RPM 20 gph (Van's standard cruise performance power setting)
2300 RPM 15 gph - airspeed was 1 knot faster than at the 2500 RPM setting.
2100 RPM 12 gph - airspeed was 6 knots slower than at the 2500 RPM setting.
Making the following assumptions: 60 gallons of fuel usable less a 1/2 hour reserve, and using Van's Aircraft RV-10 cruise performance of about 200 mph.
At 2500 RPM, there is 2 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of 500 miles.
At 2300 RPM, there is 3 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of just over 700 miles.
At 2100 RPM, there is 4 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of almost 870 miles.
Or . . .
At 2100 RPM, after flying for 2 1/2 hours and covering 480 plus miles, you would still have about half of your fuel remaining.
According to MT Propeller (for a "natural composite" MT Propeller); running a Lycoming 200 RPM below the manifold pressure is acceptable.
The 2100 RPM 23" MP power setting would be an acceptable cruise power setting with a "natural composite" MT Propeller.
A commonly accepted lowest RPM power setting for an aluminum blade propeller would be 2300 RPM at 23" MP. (For anyone that is interested, MT Propeller does manufacture aluminum blade propellers.)
Regards,
Jim Ayers
PS A reduction in airspeed with a higher RPM is expected. As an approximation, the RPM increase is linear, but the horsepower increase requirement is at a power of 2.
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:25 pm Post subject: 540 power settings |
|
|
Jim, its great to have hard numbers.
John - KUAO
From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of LessDragProd(at)aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:10 AM
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: 540 power settings
Just some general information on three different 540 power settings.
This information was obtained in an unfinished (unpainted and some fairings missing) RV-10 with a 3 blade MT Propeller.
The data was taken at 8,000' density altitude, at full throttle (around 23' MP) and leaned consistently:
2500 RPM 20 gph (Van's standard cruise performance power setting)
2300 RPM 15 gph - airspeed was 1 knot faster than at the 2500 RPM setting.
2100 RPM 12 gph - airspeed was 6 knots slower than at the 2500 RPM setting.
Making the following assumptions: 60 gallons of fuel usable less a 1/2 hour reserve, and using Van's Aircraft RV-10 cruise performance of about 200 mph.
At 2500 RPM, there is 2 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of 500 miles.
At 2300 RPM, there is 3 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of just over 700 miles.
At 2100 RPM, there is 4 1/2 hours of fuel available for a range of almost 870 miles.
Or . . .
At 2100 RPM, after flying for 2 1/2 hours and covering 480 plus miles, you would still have about half of your fuel remaining.
According to MT Propeller (for a "natural composite" MT Propeller); running a Lycoming 200 RPM below the manifold pressure is acceptable.
The 2100 RPM 23" MP power setting would be an acceptable cruise power setting with a "natural composite" MT Propeller.
A commonly accepted lowest RPM power setting for an aluminum blade propeller would be 2300 RPM at 23" MP. (For anyone that is interested, MT Propeller does manufacture aluminum blade propellers.)
Regards,
Jim Ayers
PS A reduction in airspeed with a higher RPM is expected. As an approximation, the RPM increase is linear, but the horsepower increase requirement is at a power of 2.
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dick Sipp
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 215 Location: Hope, MI
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: 540 power settings |
|
|
Jim:
Are the RPM limits you refer to in the second half of your message MT limits for their propellers?
The Lycoming IO-540-D series charts from the engine operators manual provide much broader RPM vs. manifold pressure limits.
Above 5500' there is no manifold pressure limitation for any RPM. Below 5500' manifold pressure limits are shown; as an example,
at 1800 RPM 24 inches of manifold pressure is the limitation. At sea level and 2200 RPM the manifold pressure limit is 28.5", above 2200 RPM there is no manifold pressure limit.
These charts show that the old wives tale of not operating "oversquare" is mostly legend and not a problem as far as Lycoming is concerned.
While I am not suggesting that operating continuously at a limitation is prudent, very efficient operation does occur at full throttle settings and relatively low RPMs. An added benefit is smoother and quieter operation as well.
It would be a shame if MT placed more restrictive limits on engine operation than does the engine manufacturer.
Dick Sipp
40065
Quote: |
According to MT Propeller (for a "natural composite" MT Propeller); running a Lycoming 200 RPM below the manifold pressure is acceptable.
The 2100 RPM 23" MP power setting would be an acceptable cruise power setting with a "natural composite" MT Propeller.
A commonly accepted lowest RPM power setting for an aluminum blade propeller would be 2300 RPM at 23" MP. (For anyone that is interested, MT Propeller does manufacture aluminum blade propellers.)
Regards,
Jim Ayers
PS A reduction in airspeed with a higher RPM is expected. As an approximation, the RPM increase is linear, but the horsepower increase requirement is at a power of 2.
|
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LessDragProd(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:30 am Post subject: 540 power settings |
|
|
Hi All,
I received the following answer from MT Propeller engineering regarding the question Dick Sipp asked.
"Hi Jim,
As I told you yesterday on the telephone our propeller has no limitations in respect to rpm and MAP settings, like 28 inch and 2200 rpm. This problem is only with aluminum propellers.
So, we have no limitations of our propeller operation except the engine limitations from the engine manufacture still apply.
With best regards,
MT - Propeller Entwicklung GmbH
Martin Albrecht
Engineering"
So I hope this answers your question, Dick.
The engine is the limiting factor with the 3 blade MT Propeller.
For continuous operation; 1800 RPM at 25" mp to 2200 RPM at 29" mp.
Whereas the aluminum blade propeller is the limiting factor on the Lycoming engine.
And you're right. It is a shame if the propeller manufacturer "placed more restrictive limits on engine operation than does the engine manufacturer." Unfortunately, it appears to be a Hartzell problem.
Regards,
Jim Ayers
In a message dated 04/20/2006 8:21:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rsipp(at)earthlink.net writes:
Quote: | Jim:
Are the RPM limits you refer to in the second half of your message MT limits for their propellers?
The Lycoming IO-540-D series charts from the engine operators manual provide much broader RPM vs. manifold pressure limits.
Above 5500' there is no manifold pressure limitation for any RPM. Below 5500' manifold pressure limits are shown; as an example,
at 1800 RPM 24 inches of manifold pressure is the limitation. At sea level and 2200 RPM the manifold pressure limit is 28.5", above 2200 RPM there is no manifold pressure limit.
These charts show that the old wives tale of not operating "oversquare" is mostly legend and not a problem as far as Lycoming is concerned.
While I am not suggesting that operating continuously at a limitation is prudent, very efficient operation does occur at full throttle settings and relatively low RPMs. An added benefit is smoother and quieter operation as well.
It would be a shame if MT placed more restrictive limits on engine operation than does the engine manufacturer.
Dick Sipp
40065
|
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|