Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RV9A and why

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV9-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rv9jim(at)juno.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 6:07 am    Post subject: RV9A and why Reply with quote

Rafeal,
I went thru the same decisions. I went for the 9A beacuse of the
better handling as slow speeds. I however went with the IO-360 (ala -
RV7 fwf). I did this because with the IO 360 and LOW COMPRESSION
pistons you still have 167 hp. More than enough for the 9A. The big
reason again is: First, the low compression version is 7.2 : 1 which
allows for (need i say) auto gas. I refer to it as garbage gas. This
can give you the lowest cost in fuel as the years go by. Good HP but
with the lowest cost. Second: The injected engine can be run at
maximum efficiency ie: lean of peak. The carb engine can not. So I
traded about 30# extra in the 360 engine for lower operating cost. Next,
I bought the engine with a solid crank so I could not add a constant
speed prop. My project is at the prop spinner stage. As I finish this up
in the next few days, I will be doing the wings next. I bought the QB
kit and I have about 1250 hours in it now. You can look over my build at
www.websites.expercraft.com/jimn where I have been documenting the
build. I have my comments about the build both + & - . So far it has
been a good build. I expect to have it flying in 3 to 4 months. Of
course depending on the hurrican season here in florida (St. Petersburg).
Then again, using the IO 320 is a very good option. I would do
it with the 150 hp engine and a constant speed prop to get the whole 150
hp. Then again, the cost of upkeep on the constant speed prop has to be
figured in the equasion. So I went for the simpler fixed sensenich prop
and the low comp. IO 360 with a fixed prop. Gives me the HP with the
simplicity and few controls. Does this all make sense? Its the way I
figured it and went.

Jim Nelson
N15JN
RV9-A


- The Matronics RV9-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV9-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV9-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group