Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fusible Link for Lightspeed Ignition

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rsmith52



Joined: 16 Mar 2017
Posts: 15
Location: Crawford, CO

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:05 am    Post subject: Fusible Link for Lightspeed Ignition Reply with quote

I am using dual lightspeed ignitions on my project. Lightspeed's instructions specify using 18ga shielded wire, the shield used as the ground return and wiring directly from the battery to a 7.5 amp panel circuit breaker. I want to use a fusible links to protect the wires from the battteries to the circuit breaker. I acquired 14 gauge shielded wire. My plan was to separate the conductor from the shield, use an 18ga conductor for the fusible link and solder an 18 ga ground lead to the shield. The problem I am having is separating the center wire from the shield. I end up breaking 30 to 50% of the tiny shield strands while separating the center conductor. The resulting connection is less than ideal both electrically and security wise. I'm thinking a better method would be to roll shield back over the outer insulation and use a solder sleeve with an 18ga pigtail. I have made a couple practice connections and they seem very secure, especially when the whole joint is reinforced with some additional heat shrink. Does this seem like an okay approach? It's a very important termination.

- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
user9253



Joined: 28 Mar 2008
Posts: 1908
Location: Riley TWP Michigan

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2023 11:02 am    Post subject: Re: Fusible Link for Lightspeed Ignition Reply with quote

Have you tried using this method?
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/shldwire/shldwire.html


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
Joe Gores
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnbright



Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 165
Location: Newport News, VA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2023 3:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Fusible Link for Lightspeed Ignition Reply with quote

FYI Bob has some thoughts on Lightspeed EI power wiring.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j8g0Jw4tWHRNQcJOlmlmixCv2Oz16MrZXvuxcTfEZ6M/edit?usp=share_link


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
John Bright, RV-6A, at FWF, O-360
Z-101 single batt dual alt SDS EM-5-F.
john_s_bright@yahoo.com, Newport News, Va
N1921R links
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 9:45 am    Post subject: Fusible Link for Lightspeed Ignition Reply with quote

At 01:04 PM 3/28/2023, you wrote:
Quote:
I am using dual lightspeed ignitions on my project. Lightspeed's instructions specify using 18ga shielded wire, the shield used as the ground return and wiring directly from the battery to a 7.5 amp panel circuit breaker. I want to use a fusible links to protect the wires from the battteries to the circuit breaker. I acquired 14 gauge shielded wire. My plan was to separate the conductor from the shield, use an 18ga conductor for the fusible link and solder an 18 ga ground lead to the shield. The problem I am having is separating the center wire from the shield. I end up breaking 30 to 50% of the tiny shield strands while separating the center conductor. The resulting connection is less than ideal both electrically and security wise. I'm thinking a better method would be to roll shield back over the outer insulation and use a solder sleeve with an 18ga pigtail. I have made a couple practice connections and they seem very secure, especially when the whole joint is reinforced with some additional heat shrink. Does this seem like an okay approach? It's a very important termination.

I've had numerous conversations with Klaus about
his power delivery suggestions over the years . . .
the last being while witnessing some tests on
his product during an inquiry as to cause of
a LA-IV crash out in CA.

https://tinyurl.com/52kbwra8

This case was intently interested in the
performance of those 'very important terminations'.

The engine died in an approach to landing
and ended up on the rocks. Both fuses feeding
the pair of ignition systems were open.
As it turns out, the system was DESIGNED
to fail as explained in analysis documentation.
The project also showed lapses in
choice of materials and fabrication
processes.

Which brings me to this assertion: Failure
of your ignition system(s) will most
likely be a product of poor design and/or
installation error. The accident cited
above was a demonstration of BOTH of
these effects.

Klaus' recommendations are not 'wrong' . . .
just unnecessary . . . and they ignore
a century of lessons learned in the design
and fabrication of reliable aircraft
systems.

Others have cited some of my writings
on the topic of Lightspeed systems. But
in a nutshell, the use of shielded wire
connected directly to battery(ies) driving
panel mounted breakers is both unnecessary
and contrary to a 747-load of lessons
learned.

Those ignition systems will draw no more
than 2.5A at red-line rpm. Each one would
run happily fed by 5A fuse (from either a
hot battery or multi-path fed engine bus)
and 20AWG wire (for mechanical robustness,
not current draw). You have TWO systems,
each of which will run the engine. They
are pre-flight tested. If some failure takes
out a fuse (or opens a breaker), being able
to restore the power path is of exceedingly
low value . . . it will just re-open due
to the fault that caused the first event.

You can confidently skip the shielded wire
and crew-monitored circuit protection
while exploiting benefits of legacy-
proven design and fabrication techniques.



Bob . . .

  ////
  (o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
=================================

In the interest of creative evolution
of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based
on physics and good practice.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group