  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 8:21 am    Post subject: PC680 Failure Analysis | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				A few weeks ago I received a PC680 battery from
 Joe Gores that was presenting intermittent behaviors.
 Seems the battery would 'go open' but perhaps with some
 external coaxing, prodding, banging, etc . . . it would
 come alive.
 
 Got a chance to get on the mill in Wichita last week
 and we carved the top off the failed battery for
 inspection.
 
 The battery's as-received condition is illustrated
 at  http://tinyurl.com/zkp45md
 
 There was no evidence of external damage or internal
 distress. Terminal voltage as received was zero. I tried
 some external forces suggested by Joe to no avail.
 
 Tear-down images are posted at http://tinyurl.com/hspd7kt
 
 A 4-wire ohmmeter was used to check inter-cell
 connections http://tinyurl.com/z5wauwc. All execpt the
 leftmost interconnect presented sub-milliohm continuity.
 The leftmost joint was open circuit.
 
 Prying this joint open . . .
 
 http://tinyurl.com/hcmns8t
 
 . . . revealed a weld fracture wherein the entire
 face of the weld exhibits corrosion; there was
 no evidence of a metallic bridge across the joint
 prior to opening it up.
 
 It appears this failure was a long time in the
 making.
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		user9253
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1944 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:18 am    Post subject: Re: PC680 Failure Analysis | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Bob,
 I am happy that you found a problem and it was not my imagination.  If that broken weld were repaired, I'm sure the battery would crank an engine just fine.  The battery was new in 2010.  (The sticker with 2016 on it is not the date.)  I have not been reimbursed for the postage yet.  The post office clerk said that using a flat-rate box saved half the cost of sending in a plain cardboard box.
   The lesson to be learned from this is that even though a battery failure is highly unlikely, it can happen.  The first symptom (low voltage alarm at idle RPM) occurred while flying, even though the engine cranked just fine.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Joe Gores | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		kenryan
 
 
  Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Posts: 429
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:39 am    Post subject: PC680 Failure Analysis | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I wonder if this battery would have passed the 80% draw down test?
 
 On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)>
  
  A few weeks ago I received a PC680 battery from
  Joe Gores that was presenting intermittent behaviors.
  Seems the battery would 'go open' but perhaps with some
  external coaxing, prodding, banging, etc . . . it would
  come alive.
  
  Got a chance to get on the mill in Wichita last week
  and we carved the top off the failed battery for
  inspection.
  
  The battery's as-received condition is illustrated
  at  http://tinyurl.com/zkp45md
  
  There was no evidence of external damage or internal
  distress. Terminal voltage as received was zero. I tried
  some external forces suggested by Joe to no avail.
  
  Tear-down images are posted at http://tinyurl.com/hspd7kt
  
  A 4-wire ohmmeter was used to check inter-cell
  connections http://tinyurl.com/z5wauwc. All execpt the
  leftmost interconnect presented sub-milliohm continuity.
  The leftmost joint was open circuit.
  
  Prying this joint open . . .
  
  http://tinyurl.com/hcmns8t
  
  . . . revealed a weld fracture wherein the entire
  face of the weld exhibits corrosion; there was
  no evidence of a metallic bridge across the joint
  prior to opening it up.
  
  It appears this failure was a long time in the
  making.
  
  
    Bob . . . 
  
  ====================================
   -
  Electric-List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
  ====================================
   FORUMS -
  eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
  ====================================
  WIKI -
  errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
  ====================================
  b Site -
            -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
  ====================================
  
  
  
   | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:06 pm    Post subject: PC680 Failure Analysis | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 01:35 PM 9/16/2016, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | I wonder if this battery would have passed the 80% draw down test? | 	  
    Interesting thought. I suppose I could have
    tested it right after opening it up . . .
    but its been open to atmosphere for quite awhile.
    I put a charger on a couple of cells
    but they've dried out.
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |